PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asrock N68-VS3 FX (all builds) |
Memory | 2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20111007 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 29 '19 at 21:07 |
Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
Run User | UKR-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon II X2 240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
44.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Asus(1043 83B0) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
|
3.93%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 55 59 60 65 65 MB/s
|
34.8%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM 533 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
17.6%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 18x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 15x |
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples | 12x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples | 16x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 8x |
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $138 |