Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 11 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 29 '19 at 18:45
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A8-5600K APU-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 141
60% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 230
32% 234 Pts
64-Core 230
15% 230 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
ASRock(1849 9901) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 13.101.0.0
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
2.53% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 5.15
Parallax 4.47
3% 4.24 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 3.96
1% 3.32 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.53%
Great: 5%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$32
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z220
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 301 312 327 277 307 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 394
Write 333
Mixed 255
SusWrite 302
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 13.8
94% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 85.3
97% 164 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 85%
WD WD2500AVJS-63B6A0 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 76 76 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 77
Write 77.2
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 77.6
52% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 52%
Generic- Multiple Reader 64GB
59GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 27.5
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 24.6
38% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.1
207% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 25%
Maxone USB 3.0 320GB
246GB free, PID 0000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 88 88 91 91 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 89.8
Write 89.8
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 89.6
107% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 6GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 0.6
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical FM2A75 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $240
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback