Asus CM6870

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus CM6870  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6870
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121225
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateOct 29 '19 at 16:15
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 207
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 509
54% 431 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 40.9
32% 36.8 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 38
Splatting 36
31% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBAT128G1002 128GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2317002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 151 174 177 178 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 466
Write 163
Mixed 166
SusWrite 164
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 12.5
84% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 78
85% 141 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 69%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 106 108 109 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 101
Write 102
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 106
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$99
485GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 93 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 49.1
Write 75.9
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 90.8
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.4
176% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$99
388GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 103 109 113 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 48.7
Write 73.3
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 108
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.4
182% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 90%
Asmt 2105 500GB
94GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 14.6
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 8.6
14% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
759GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 62 64 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 69.7
Write 85.4
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 61.9
58% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
193% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 66%
Asmt 2105 4TB
119GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 9.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.88% Terrible
Read 25
Write 27.3
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 8.7
16% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9.88%
Great: 99%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB
51GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8.3 8.7 8.7 8.6 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 28.4
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 8.5
17% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.4
141% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 97%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB
528GB free, PID 1018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 28
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 8.3
30% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
85% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
32.7% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 10.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6870 Builds (Compare 644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6870

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback