To Intel X79

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	91.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	To Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190717
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 29 '19 at 15:18
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 47.3 2-Core 219 63% 116 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 560 57% 462 Pts	64-Core 560 35% 560 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2352 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 118 Parallax 100 93% 111 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 106 Splatting 105 86% 106 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB 6,044 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0620A SusWrite @10s intervals: 1091 1117 774 105 111 154 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	155% Outstanding	Read 1,272 Write 1138 Mixed 882 SusWrite 559 215% 963 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 30.6 143% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 702 DQ Write 540 DQ Mixed 516 414% 586 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 234%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 173GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 254 303 300 307 304 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 147 Write 98 Mixed 84.3 SusWrite 303 36% 158 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 16.6 4K Mixed 9.9 39% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 14.7 DQ Write 16.1 DQ Mixed 14.7 11% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 4x4GB 2,611 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	MC Read 37 MC Write 43.8 MC Mixed 38.4 114% 39.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 11.9 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	504x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	215x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	95x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	140x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	112x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	89x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	47x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	41x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	198x
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	190x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16