Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime4 Days
Run DateOct 29 '19 at 05:23
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
43.9% Average
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 132
49% 102 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 302
34% 264 Pts
64-Core 306
21% 306 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.10.2
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
31.8% Below average
Lighting 121
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 175
32% 122 fps
MRender 56.2
Gravity 125
Splatting 77.9
32% 86.3 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 42%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$97
144GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 319 347 348 352 354 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 296
Write 352
Mixed 290
SusWrite 338
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 34.7
112% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 34.9
DQ Write 64.7
DQ Mixed 44.2
35% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 122 99 116 154 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 115
Write 120
Mixed 66
SusWrite 122
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 113%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
15GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 6.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 8.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Read 20
Write 8.3
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 7.4
13% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL10-8GBXL Corsair CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL Corsair CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 15
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 12.2
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 5,360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $133

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $558
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback