Asus P9X79 LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 LE  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateOct 29 '19 at 03:40
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-4820K-$175
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.5% Above average
1-Core 92
2-Core 177
64% 135 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 497
48% 382 Pts
64-Core 496
33% 496 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Gigabyte(1458 227D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 116
Reflection 91.7
Parallax 152
31% 120 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 104
Splatting 92.7
28% 87.2 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 29%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$51
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 477
Write 353
Mixed 396
91% 409 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 51
166% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$35
82GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 152 157 157 157 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 111
Write 162
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 156
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 29.3
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 13.2
17% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
209% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 93%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
185GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 26
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 12.3
30% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 45%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
701GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 25.7
Mixed 25
SusWrite 12.3
30% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 10.7
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P9X79 LE Builds (Compare 2,743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 LE - $434

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,351
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback