Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	15.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	13.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 29 '19 at 01:10
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 61.9 2-Core 145 61% 99.8 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 411 41% 332 Pts	64-Core 385 24% 385 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% EVGA(3842 2673) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.5% Poor	Lighting 31.3 Reflection 32.3 Parallax 40.2 26% 34.6 fps	MRender 46 Gravity 37.5 Splatting 33.3 31% 39 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 472 Write 424 Mixed 382 95% 426 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 79.6 4K Mixed 50.2 164% 56 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 233 DQ Mixed 245 184% 244 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 134GB free Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 277 277 278 276 272 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 479 Write 434 Mixed 408 SusWrite 290 90% 403 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 48.6 160% 54.9 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 182 155% 227 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 118%
Hitachi HDN 724030ALE640 3TB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 400GB free Firmware: MJ8O SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 113 113 113 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 94 Write 96.3 Mixed 16 SusWrite 113 58% 79.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 86%
Hitachi HDN 724040ALE640 4TB 253 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3TB free Firmware: MJAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 159 159 159 159 158 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 150 Mixed 40 SusWrite 159 91% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 90%
Hitachi HDN 724030ALE640 3TB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: MJ8O SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 125 125 125 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 133 Write 126 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 124 73% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 168% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 86%
DOGFISH SSD 120GB 104GB free, PID 0715 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 255 256 258 257 257 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	177% Outstanding	Read 281 Write 253 Mixed 240 SusWrite 255 347% 257 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 24.9 4K Mixed 14.1 1,397% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 18.1 DQ Write 36.9 DQ Mixed 17.3 1,911% 24.1 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB 1,383 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 18.3 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 13.3 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 62.6 64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	379x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16