Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4P-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	37.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4P-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170608
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '19 at 19:51
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 95.2 1-Core 104 2-Core 195 77% 131 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 647 58% 489 Pts	64-Core 824 51% 824 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Gigabyte(1458 254D) 3GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.3.3 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Lighting 48.4 Reflection 32.4 Parallax 65 39% 48.6 fps	MRender 30.7 Gravity 50 Splatting 40.3 33% 40.3 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M6e PCIe M.2 128GB-$190 585 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 637 Write 331 Mixed 308 93% 425 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 34.7 130% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 239 208% 309 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 116%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 75GB free Firmware: EXM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 465 464 459 462 462 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 469 Mixed 409 SusWrite 462 103% 458 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 42.7 153% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 348 264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 124%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151 16,992 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 15GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 105 105 106 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	60% Above average	Read 104 Write 49 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 104 60% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1 201% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESE.M16F 1x16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	46.3% Average	MC Read 20 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 14.5 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 16.8 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 56.7 71% 56.7 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-UD4P-CF Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4P-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	56x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	43x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	22x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	17x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x

SSD
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	15x
NVMe LITEON 512GBCx2-8b512-q11Bench 181%, 1,201 samples	7x
M.2 PCIe SSD 512GBSpccBench 203%, 29,096 samples	7x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2800 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 182 samples	10x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 4x8GBHyperX $165Bench 81%, 6,271 samples	8x
M393A2G40EB1-CRC 4x16GBSamsungBench 98%, 194 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $330

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16