Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H310CM-HDV (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190514
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '19 at 11:11
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 131 2-Core 252 89% 158 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 373 43% 337 Pts	64-Core 391 24% 391 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gainward(10B0 1380) 2GB CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Lighting 22.7 Reflection 17.8 Parallax 22.8 18% 21.1 fps	MRender 26.1 Gravity 23.4 Splatting 15.4 17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 266GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 35 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 115 Write 35.8 Mixed 45.4 SusWrite 35.8 43% 58 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 105% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 905GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 70 49 49 45 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 119 Write 125 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 52.8 68% 92 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CB4GU2400.C8FT 2x4GB 169 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 24.7 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 25.8 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,793 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,297x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,135x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	135x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	564x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	308x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	267x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	181x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	134x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	126x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	91x
PSD48G266681 2x8GBPatriotBench 79%, 6,425 samples	81x
CM4X8GD3200C16K2E 2x8GBCorsairBench 84%, 6,228 samples	71x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $285

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16