Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190125
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '19 at 20:55
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 86.5 1-Core 112 2-Core 213 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 640 59% 495 Pts	64-Core 857 53% 857 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 8C95) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 440.97 Performing below potential (94^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (68 fps cap detected)	55% Above average	Lighting 67.1 Reflection 67.8 Parallax 58.8 55% 64.6 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 64.9 Splatting 69 56% 67.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116 16,263 User benchmarks, average bench 267% 378GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN163 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1045 1077 1090 1118 1089 1120 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	228% Outstanding	Read 1,337 Write 1,120 Mixed 972 SusWrite 1,090 254% 1,130 MB/s	4K Read 56.4 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 71.4 235% 79.3 MB/s	DQ Read 913 DQ Write 658 DQ Mixed 847 616% 806 MB/s
Poor: 158% ↑ This bench: 228% Great: 355%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 332GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 115 113 114 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 125 Write 110 Mixed 91.7 SusWrite 114 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 109%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB 10,689 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 145GB free Firmware: 10.02E02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 60 61 61 61 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 59.5 Write 60.5 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 60.1 41% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB 87,241 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 42 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 36.2 107% 37.3 GB/s	SC Read 25.3 SC Write 36.6 SC Mixed 28.8 86% 30.2 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	171x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	244x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	183x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $673

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16