Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '19 at 22:34
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Memory 83.1 1-Core 130 2-Core 257 86% 157 Pts	4-Core 464 8-Core 807 77% 636 Pts	64-Core 1,075 67% 1,075 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 440.97 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.62% Terrible	Lighting 4.23 Reflection 4.35 Parallax 4.16 4% 4.25 fps	MRender 3.86 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.13 4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.62% Great: 4%
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 8660) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 440.97 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	120% Outstanding	Lighting 162 Reflection 153 Parallax 163 132% 159 fps	MRender 176 Gravity 139 Splatting 105 111% 140 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 524 295 295 291 289 286 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	230% Outstanding	Read 2,278 Write 1,412 Mixed 1,199 SusWrite 330 288% 1,305 MB/s	4K Read 53.1 4K Write 141 4K Mixed 71.6 247% 88.6 MB/s	DQ Read 967 DQ Write 918 DQ Mixed 988 729% 958 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 230% Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$474 2,198 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 817GB free Firmware: RVM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 460 462 422 434 445 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 460 Mixed 437 SusWrite 446 103% 458 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 52.9 181% 65.1 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 347 262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 131%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 193 192 192 192 193 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 155 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 192 100% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.9 353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3600C18 4x8GB 859 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	68% Good	MC Read 24.4 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 21.5 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 21.1 57% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 123%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	210x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	169x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	158x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	186x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	173x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	128x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,049

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16