Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9950 2,150 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	47.6% Average	Memory 69.8 1-Core 37 2-Core 76.9 40% 61.2 Pts	4-Core 150 8-Core 151 20% 150 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4870-X2 (Crossfire Disabled) 438 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Dell(1028 2042) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	6.98% Terrible	Lighting 8.83 Reflection 7.81 Parallax 6.66 7% 7.77 fps	MRender 6.29 Gravity 6.7 Splatting 10.1 7% 7.71 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.98% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 240GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 114 127 132 110 119 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.5% Below average	Read 226 Write 178 Mixed 160 SusWrite 127 39% 173 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 14.8 47% 12.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5GB 14,654 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 1024, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 8.9 23% 7.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+AMDBench 41%, 5,594 samples	4x
Phenom 9850AMDBench 46%, 2,080 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GTS 250NvidiaBench 7%, 14,881 samples	2x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	2x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	1x

SSD
860 EVO 1TBSamsungBench 73%, 277 samples	2x
SS DSC2BW180A4 180GBIntelBench 59%, 89 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16