Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q536FD
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181221
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateOct 25 '19 at 07:47
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 264
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 576
63% 498 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1481) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.05% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 7.28
5% 7.75 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 6.43
Splatting 13.3
9% 10.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.05%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1102 256GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 197 200 201 206 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 456
Write 406
Mixed 268
SusWrite 204
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 32.3
116% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 256
210% 300 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 124 129 132 132 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 109
Write 108
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 126
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 67%
Corsair Survivor 3.0 64GB
45GB free, PID 1a0a, corsair
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 11 16 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.95% Terrible
Read 22.2
Write 10.3
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 12
19% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
97% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.95%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.7% Good
MC Read 29
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 20.5
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 22
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback