Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8309
Memory	2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190319
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 24 '19 at 20:30
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	85%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 72.5 1-Core 100 2-Core 202 70% 125 Pts	4-Core 360 8-Core 622 60% 491 Pts	64-Core 822 51% 822 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% HP(103C 8338) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.7 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Lighting 33.9 Reflection 25.1 Parallax 31.1 28% 30 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 32.3 Splatting 31.5 27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB 8,655 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,649 Write 680 Mixed 649 217% 993 MB/s	4K Read 46.1 4K Write 97.1 4K Mixed 57.5 195% 66.9 MB/s	DQ Read 690 DQ Write 565 DQ Mixed 646 478% 633 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 317%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 254GB free Firmware: MS2OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 180 178 178 180 182 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 115 Write 113 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 179 78% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 107%
WD WD3200JS-63PDB1 320GB 3,111 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 241GB free Firmware: 21.00M21 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 62 64 64 64 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 62.7 Write 63.2 Mixed 46 SusWrite 63.2 43% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB 22,600 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 13.8 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 14.3 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 55%

Yacht

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	166x
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	86x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	70x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	202x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	135x
HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 2,884 samples	75x

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $299

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16