Asrock FM2A75M-DGS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '19 at 19:20
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 112
53% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 224
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron M600 M.2 2280 256GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DL01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 350 369 358 303 302 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 445
Write 392
Mixed 362
SusWrite 334
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 37.9
117% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 202
166% 236 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 108%
Mushkin ECO3 480GB-$155
305GB free
Firmware: O1126A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 194 93 96 94 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 351
Write 335
Mixed 278
SusWrite 142
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 38.8
124% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 35.7
DQ Write 71.7
DQ Mixed 46.6
37% 51.3 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 101%
Micron M600 M.2 2280 256GB
204GB free
Firmware: DL01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 305 317 318 312 306 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 270
Write 340
Mixed 272
SusWrite 307
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 29.5
97% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.3
DQ Write 76.8
DQ Mixed 40
34% 48.7 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79
220GB free
Firmware: 3.CHL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 75 74 75 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 75.3
Write 46.2
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 74.7
44% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 44%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
66GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 55.7
Write 52.1
Mixed 32
SusWrite 19.2
29% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
197GB free
Firmware: ML6OAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 66 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 72.8
Write 76.8
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 65.2
49% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
15GB free
Firmware: CC3H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 19 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 51.1
Write 42
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 19.5
28% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 16GB
667, 667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.3% Below average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75M-DGS Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback