| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5QL-E (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20081201 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 24 '19 at 17:48 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
41.7%
Average
|
34% 48.9 Pts
|
15% 109 Pts
|
7% 109 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1230 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
36.2%
Below average
|
33% 52.4 fps
|
42% 51.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$30
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 33 29 65 74 97 MB/s
|
47.8%
Average
|
58% 79.4 MB/s
|
102% 0.63 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB
320GB free
Firmware: SE0OA4A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 79 82 81 81 MB/s
|
46.5%
Average
|
48% 66.9 MB/s
|
110% 0.9 MB/s
| |
|
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
9GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.9 5.2 6.1 6 5.6 MB/s
|
4%
Terrible
|
7% 6.28 MB/s
|
24% 1.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
17.1%
Very poor
|
15% 5.4 GB/s
|
14% 4.83 GB/s
|
35% 114 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5QL-E Builds (Compare 143 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5QL-E
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 19x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 17x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 14x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 11x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 9x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 34% - Below average | Total price: $307 |