Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion VS394AA-ABU p6205uk (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON EVANS
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20100126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 24 '19 at 12:21
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron E3200 981 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Memory 53.4 1-Core 31.3 2-Core 61.9 32% 48.9 Pts	4-Core 60.5 8-Core 65.9 8% 63.2 Pts	64-Core 58.4 4% 58.4 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 2872) 2GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Lighting 20.8 Reflection 23.8 Parallax 35.3 17% 26.6 fps	MRender 33.7 Gravity 29.6 Splatting 25.1 24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 287GB free (System drive) Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 13 18 36 43 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 14 Write 20.8 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 27.3 17% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 60%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55 14,577 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 58GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 17 28 50 54 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Read 51.8 Write 22.3 Mixed 33.6 SusWrite 36.7 27% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 109% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 44%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43 15,932 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 148GB free Firmware: HP11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 13 18 37 44 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 17.3 Write 13 Mixed 34.6 SusWrite 27.7 18% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 124% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 58%
WDC WD16 00BB-00GUA0 160GB 11GB free, PID 2507 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.1 8.2 14 16 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.92% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 17.1 Mixed 16 SusWrite 10.5 21% 15.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 52% 0.63 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 2.2 5% 1.77 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Celeron E3200IntelBench 36%, 981 samples	1x
Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $115Bench 44%, 20,482 samples	1x

GPU
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	1x
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16