To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	MICRO-STAR MS-6657
Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090922
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '19 at 20:08
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium T4500 8,800 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	34.7% Below average	Memory 59.7 1-Core 31.8 2-Core 60.6 34% 50.7 Pts	4-Core 59.1 8-Core 61.1 8% 60.1 Pts	64-Core 61.6 4% 61.6 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia ION 1,623 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 4570) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 0.19 1% 0.95 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.43 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 412GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 166 165 171 181 187 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.5% Poor	Read 113 Write 91.7 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 170 26% 113 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 16.8 4K Mixed 9.9 39% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 14.5 DQ Write 16.4 DQ Mixed 14.4 11% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 102%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 87GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 28 29 30 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 33 Write 32 Mixed 21 SusWrite 28.5 38% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 45%
Generic- Multi-Card 16GB 234 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 14GB free, PID 0159 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.3 9 8.5 8.9 8.3 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 19.3 Write 11.5 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 9 13% 11 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2.3 153% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16HTF51264HZ-800C1 2x4GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM SDRAM 2048 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	712x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	615x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	102x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16