To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-6657
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090922
Uptime7 Days
Run DateOct 23 '19 at 19:08
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Pentium T4500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
1-Core 39.2
2-Core 72.1
26% 55.7 Pts
4-Core 75.5
8-Core 72.3
10% 73.9 Pts
64-Core 75.5
5% 75.5 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 21%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia ION
MSI(1462 4570) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 0.7
1% 2.37 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.3
1% 3 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$53
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 141 165 162 172 177 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.9% Poor
Read 165
Write 90.8
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 159
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 8.7
36% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 15.6
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 102%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
87GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 29 28 29 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 23.7
Write 26
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 27.4
32% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 45%
Generic- Multi-Card 16GB
14GB free, PID 0159
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.7 9.6 9.5 9.8 9.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
8.93% Terrible
Read 19
Write 10.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 9.7
14% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.93%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 16HTF51264HZ-800C1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM 2048 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 23%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 8,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback