Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '19 at 05:20
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700K-$349
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
67.9% Good
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 238
77% 168 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 616
62% 491 Pts
64-Core 558
37% 558 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$700
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (99 fps cap detected)
29% Poor
Lighting 99.5
Reflection 99.5
Parallax 99.3
26% 99.4 fps
MRender 99.5
Gravity 99.5
Splatting 99.5
29% 99.5 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 29%
Great: 133%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$85
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 52 54 54 54 56 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 77% Great: 125%
Adata XPG SX8000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$90
120GB free
Firmware: C2.1.3 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 427 430 440 440 442 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 945
Write 423
Mixed 516
SusWrite 438
129% 581 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 56.8
210% 85.1 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 440
DQ Mixed 299
247% 350 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 146%
Great: 168%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$400
369GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1042 452 445 453 453 454 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,197
Write 1,039
Mixed 783
SusWrite 550
200% 892 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 62.5
218% 84.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,342
DQ Write 1,016
DQ Mixed 980
787% 1,113 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 201%
Great: 302%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$99
198GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 174 175 168 175 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 99.5
Write 83
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 172
69% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
351% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$227
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 28.6
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 27.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 53.5
75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 115%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,560
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback