Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '19 at 05:08
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700K-$378
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
75.8% Very good
1-Core 128
2-Core 201
81% 165 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 562
62% 476 Pts
64-Core 591
40% 591 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$650
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 431
Reflection 424
Parallax 552
113% 469 fps
MRender 377
Gravity 438
Splatting 245
125% 353 fps
Poor: 112%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$55
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 38 40 43 44 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 125%
Adata XPG SX8000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$90
120GB free
Firmware: C2.1.3 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 333 340 367 376 382 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 855
Write 426
Mixed 490
SusWrite 374
119% 536 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 39.6
151% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 454
DQ Mixed 302
250% 353 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 120%
Great: 161%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$375
384GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 713 364 358 387 393 400 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,149
Write 1,021
Mixed 612
SusWrite 436
180% 805 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 49.1
163% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,110
DQ Write 848
DQ Mixed 913
701% 957 MB/s
Poor: 172%
This bench: 167%
Great: 297%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$90
198GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 174 175 173 175 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 125
Write 101
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 174
77% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
351% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86%
Great: 111%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$4
15GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 5.3 12 13 13 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 40.2
Write 14.8
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 10.7
21% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$227
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 29
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 27.8
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 21.4
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 113%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,584
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback