Dell Studio XPS 435MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Studio XPS 435MT  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0R849J
Memory1.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081114
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 22 '19 at 21:36
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 117
56% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 279
30% 236 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 3650
Dell(1028 2242) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 0.93
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 1.19
1% 1.27 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 3.22
2% 1.94 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 40 39 57 49 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.2% Below average
Read 208
Write 163
Mixed 107
SusWrite 45.5
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 16.9
64% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22.3
DQ Write 47.6
DQ Mixed 22.9
21% 30.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 76%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
282GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 56 58 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 91.8
Write 99.5
Mixed 58
SusWrite 58.4
57% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 63%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0740
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 31 31 30 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 28.3
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 30.6
21% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x1GB
6 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.7% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 13.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435MT Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 435MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $199
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback