Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 145% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 152% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	346% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF (all builds)
Memory	122.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '19 at 20:57
Run Duration	331 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Memory 85.2 1-Core 148 2-Core 296 96% 177 Pts	4-Core 569 8-Core 1,072 98% 821 Pts	64-Core 1,662 103% 1,662 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.86 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	151% Outstanding	Lighting 208 Reflection 221 Parallax 231 170% 220 fps	MRender 243 Gravity 204 Splatting 139 154% 195 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 696GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1377 1519 2014 2091 2105 2103 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	346% Outstanding	Read 2,528 Write 2,351 Mixed 1,402 SusWrite 1,868 457% 2,037 MB/s	4K Read 52.7 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 75.2 255% 92.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,249 DQ Write 1,062 DQ Mixed 1,147 862% 1,153 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 346% Great: 425%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 327GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2108 2176 2181 2193 2181 2178 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	369% Outstanding	Read 2,496 Write 2,351 Mixed 1,446 SusWrite 2,170 475% 2,116 MB/s	4K Read 54.2 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 77.2 260% 93.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,353 DQ Write 1,189 DQ Mixed 1,258 946% 1,266 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 369% Great: 425%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 2TB 2,362 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 404 404 404 403 404 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 410 Write 415 Mixed 337 SusWrite 403 88% 391 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 27.4 89% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 185 135% 176 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 97%
WD WUH721414ALE6L4 14TB 360 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 12TB free Firmware: LDGNW07G SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 256 257 254 257 254 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 138%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB 13,353 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 851GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 113 119 122 122 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Read 97.5 Write 116 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 119 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.7 181% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 65%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 111GB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 38 38 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 34 Mixed 30 SusWrite 37.3 47% 34.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 38% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 61%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 64GB 1,196 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 45GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 25 26 26 27 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 40 Write 23 Mixed 12.3 SusWrite 24.7 31% 25 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.3 31% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A4G43MB1-CTD 4x31.8GB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	83.4% Excellent	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 26.6 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 35.7 SC Mixed 27.3 77% 27.1 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 151%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	961x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	285x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	108x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	106x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	104x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	97x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	165x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	137x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	89x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	46x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	44x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $790

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16