Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '19 at 15:47
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 214
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 614
63% 506 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 36.6
32% 35.8 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 36.3
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 742 599 599 603 602 604 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1786
Write 1,567
Mixed 655
SusWrite 625
258% 1,158 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 49.6
179% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 44.9
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 60.1
58% 88.6 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 170%
Great: 254%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
111GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 123 125 127 127 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 435
Write 395
Mixed 348
SusWrite 158
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 45.7
158% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 40.7
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 54.2
47% 67.5 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 9.6 9.3 8.3 9.2 9.2 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.53% Terrible
Read 6.8
Write 10
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 9
6% 8.38 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 4.53%
Great: 84%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 23 50 45 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 12.7
Write 28.5
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 33.1
17% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.3% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 20.8
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 18.6
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $985
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback