Mousecomputer/7pro64 H87M-S01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMousecomputer/7pro64 H87M-S01  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer H87M-S01
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130613
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 22 '19 at 14:47
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 164
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 356
40% 313 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.6% Average
Lighting 57.6
Reflection 62.8
Parallax 51.4
47% 57.3 fps
MRender 69.1
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 60.7
52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 256GB-$152
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 207 117 138 121 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 424
Write 390
Mixed 302
SusWrite 176
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 32.2
108% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 234
207% 311 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77%
Great: 113%
Adata XPG SX900 64GB-$71
8GB free
Firmware: 5.0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 69 69 70 67 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 380
Write 80
Mixed 124
SusWrite 70.1
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 33.8
107% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 82.5
DQ Mixed 92.1
70% 93.6 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 70%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
432GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 66 65 66 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 61
Write 68.8
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 64.9
48% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2U16BC8R2-B06J 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.3% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback