Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Extreme
Intel Xeon W-2125 504 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	1-Core 127 2-Core 272 93% 200 Pts	4-Core 499 8-Core 722 79% 611 Pts	64-Core 722 48% 722 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000 5,923 User benchmarks, average bench 71% HP(103C 11A3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.70 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Lighting 262 Reflection 247 Parallax 258 69% 256 fps	MRender 187 Gravity 259 Splatting 208 71% 218 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 73%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GB 511 User benchmarks, average bench 255% 439GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA71HAQ Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 2,034 Write 1,763 Mixed 1,418 386% 1,738 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 60.4 215% 77.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,002 DQ Write 789 DQ Mixed 926 685% 906 MB/s
Poor: 203% Great: 287%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K40CB2-CTD 2x16GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 16.7 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 21.1 SC Mixed 10.4 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 68%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 42%, 5,569 samples	280x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 71%, 5,923 samples	203x
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 96%, 3,368 samples	53x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 9,244 samples	142x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 255%, 511 samples	126x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 228%, 11,679 samples	96x

RAM
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 142 samples	73x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 161 samples	54x
HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 57%, 403 samples	52x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24