| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M/U3S3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130410 |
| Uptime | 1.4 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 22 '19 at 06:01 |
| Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
74.2%
Very good
|
72% 123 Pts
|
46% 344 Pts
|
22% 352 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
53.7%
Above average
|
54% 66.9 fps
|
53% 65.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BX300 480GB-$70
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 283 334 342 345 344 MB/s
|
75.7%
Very good
|
74% 329 MB/s
|
107% 36.3 MB/s
|
155% 212 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
12GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 178 70 57 44 40 MB/s
|
43%
Average
|
36% 160 MB/s
|
93% 29.6 MB/s
|
30% 41.5 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
553GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 117 120 118 120 120 MB/s
|
68.5%
Good
|
72% 97.8 MB/s
|
148% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.3%
Above average
|
51% 17.9 GB/s
|
45% 15.8 GB/s
|
59% 67.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M/U3S3 Builds (Compare 293 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M/U3S3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 42x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 26x |
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 25x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 46x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 20x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 17x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 48% - Average | Total price: $350 |