Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	34.4% Below average	Memory 40.6 1-Core 44.8 2-Core 85.9 33% 57.1 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 168 22% 165 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.38% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.92 Parallax 2.16 2% 2.46 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 5.57 3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.38% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NT-512 512GB 740 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 448GB free Firmware: T180731 SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 320 334 338 312 308 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 303 Write 298 Mixed 293 SusWrite 326 69% 305 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 31.2 108% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 205 152% 201 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1.5GB 444 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 4 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	28.9% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 10.4 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 199 20% 199 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	2x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	1x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	1x

SSD
TS240GMTS420S 240GBTranscendBench 64%, 851 samples	1x
256GB 256GBDogfishBench 69%, 890 samples	1x

RAM
4x1.5GBUnknownBench 26%, 444 samples	1x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16