Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A10-8730B R5, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G 869 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	28.6% Poor	Memory 36 1-Core 43.8 2-Core 72.9 30% 50.9 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 129 17% 125 Pts	64-Core 130 8% 130 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 6,195 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 5120) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.40.12.06 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.28% Terrible	Lighting 4.63 Reflection 6.96 Parallax 6.66 4% 6.08 fps	MRender 5.95 Gravity 5.03 Splatting 7.7 5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.28% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB 10,890 User benchmarks, average bench 182% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1L2QEXD7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 574 606 299 303 310 310 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 1,008 Write 900 Mixed 816 SusWrite 400 175% 781 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 42.7 126% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 274 200% 264 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 247%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 2x4GB 685 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.9% Poor	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.6 28% 9.77 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 6.6 15% 5.3 GB/s	Latency 222 18% 222 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 76%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16