Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '19 at 20:26
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
1-Core 125
2-Core 248
88% 187 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 780
76% 609 Pts
64-Core 930
62% 930 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Asus(1043 0466) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
50% Above average
Lighting 192
Reflection 154
Parallax 252
52% 199 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 161
Splatting 172
47% 152 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50%
Great: 58%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$98
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1038 667 602 637 684 669 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,432
Write 1,268
Mixed 1,270
SusWrite 716
263% 1,171 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 49.3
168% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 1,165
DQ Write 976
DQ Mixed 1,071
802% 1,070 MB/s
Poor: 211%
This bench: 200%
Great: 340%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$4
11GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 8.1 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
7.01% Terrible
Read 29.5
Write 17.7
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 8.3
17% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
13% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.01%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$85
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 23.8
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 21.9
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 108%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $426
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback