Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '19 at 00:47
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$260
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
71.9% Very good
1-Core 102
2-Core 205
72% 153 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 808
75% 610 Pts
64-Core 1,729
116% 1,729 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,126
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Lighting 499
Reflection 582
Parallax 761
141% 614 fps
MRender 508
Gravity 610
Splatting 284
154% 467 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 146%
Great: 182%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
V-GEN05SM18EU480G 480GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0608A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 394 389 397 399 398 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 390
Mixed 349
SusWrite 394
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 39.5
130% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 218
173% 239 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 99%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$148
263GB free
Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1359 844 835 845 412 664 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,874
Write 1,605
Mixed 801
SusWrite 826
284% 1,277 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 44.6
156% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 527
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 487
375% 510 MB/s
Poor: 208%
This bench: 197%
Great: 378%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$150
85GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 153 153 153 153 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 474
Mixed 388
SusWrite 188
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 50.7
169% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 312
248% 346 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 115%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$70
132GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 74 74 75 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 90.5
Write 72.3
Mixed 67
SusWrite 74.5
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$70
332GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 104 104 104 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 84.7
Write 81.5
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 104
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CL14-16-16 D4-2400 CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 CL14-16-16 D4-2400 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
141% Outstanding
MC Read 58.1
MC Write 55.4
MC Mixed 54.8
160% 56.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 24.7
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 2,152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $1,622
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback