Motherboard | MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) | $137 |
CPU | Intel Core i5-9400F | $143 |
GPU | Nvidia RTX 2080 | $790 |
SSD | Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB | $65 |
RAM | Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB | $68 |
Power Supply | Corsair CX650M | $87 |
Case | Cooler Master MasterBox Q500L | $80 |
Total Price | $1,370 |
PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 341% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B98 |
Motherboard | MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) (all builds) |
Memory | 14 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190222 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 20 '19 at 21:55 |
Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
92.9%
Outstanding
|
86% 150 Pts
|
78% 604 Pts
|
48% 722 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia RTX 2080-$790
Gigabyte(1458 37C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2
|
138%
Outstanding
|
144% 178 fps
|
131% 155 fps
|
|
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$65
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2038 883 885 888 889 886 MB/s
|
341%
Outstanding
|
428% 1,914 MB/s
|
299% 105 MB/s
|
1,285% 1,724 MB/s
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
104%
Outstanding
|
106% 37.2 GB/s
|
88% 30.9 GB/s
|
75% 53.4 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-9600KIntel $210Bench 94%, 325,710 samples | 14,507x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $416Bench 97%, 515,820 samples | 12,981x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $615Bench 96%, 432,504 samples | 5,590x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 118%, 578,095 samples | 5,121x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $390Bench 89%, 574,087 samples | 4,330x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $450Bench 105%, 416,684 samples | 3,923x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $1,000 |