Asus H110M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	4.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-K (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170330
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '19 at 19:40
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Memory 92.1 1-Core 133 2-Core 260 90% 162 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 709 75% 602 Pts	64-Core 690 43% 690 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 86CB) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.22% Terrible	Lighting 4.97 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 4.91 4% 4.8 fps	MRender 6.43 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.17 4% 5.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.22% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 13 157 0.7 8.4 17 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 185 Write 104 Mixed 318 SusWrite 78.6 39% 172 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 98.6 4K Mixed 24.7 119% 48.8 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 163 156% 242 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 776GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 111 123 123 124 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 131 Write 128 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 121 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 74%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 770GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 98 103 101 101 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 109 Write 103 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 101 70% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-062.A00G 2x8GB 3,107 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	78.1% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 24.3 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 25.3 71% 25 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,918 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	1,115x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	639x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	554x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	841x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	469x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	367x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	312x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	162x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	156x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	112x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	80x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16