Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-9010 APU (2016 M.SR) 275 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Memory 35.1 1-Core 28.4 2-Core 45.7 23% 36.4 Pts	4-Core 57.2 8-Core 54.9 8% 56.1 Pts	64-Core 59.2 4% 59.2 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 4,424 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3801) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.87% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 5.27 Parallax 2.75 2% 3.37 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.43 2% 2.54 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.87% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 267 308 261 248 252 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 263 Write 271 Mixed 289 SusWrite 260 61% 271 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 20.1 4K Mixed 16.1 48% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 111 87% 121 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 12GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1200, 1200 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.63 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 226 18% 226 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	31x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 4,424 samples	16x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	11x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	24x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GBSamsungBench 53%, 567 samples	7x
M471A5143EB0-CPB 8GBSamsungBench 60%, 936 samples	6x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16