Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190902
Uptime	3.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '19 at 12:40
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$82 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Memory 78.8 1-Core 144 2-Core 262 89% 162 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 808 80% 652 Pts	64-Core 1,047 65% 1,047 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1425 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.1 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.8% Above average	Lighting 63.6 Reflection 72.3 Parallax 82 52% 72.6 fps	MRender 74.2 Gravity 65.9 Splatting 62 54% 67.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB 27,523 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 197 39 96 50 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 406 Write 96.8 Mixed 319 SusWrite 125 52% 237 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 88.1 4K Mixed 41.4 158% 56.1 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 46.5 71% 136 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 91%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 17GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 517 Write 494 Mixed 465 110% 492 MB/s	4K Read 49.5 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 65.8 223% 78.6 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 371 279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 312GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 159 158 163 164 163 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 60.5 Write 120 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 160 71% 97.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.3 77% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 107%
HGST HTS 725050A7E630 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 284GB free, PID fc76 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 97 97 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 108 Write 108 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 96.9 112% 85.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.5% Very good	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 30 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 22.7 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 28.7 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 87%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 82%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	484x
Ryzen 5 3600XAMD $210Bench 84%, 294,959 samples	160x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	155x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	92x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	89x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	88x

SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	46x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	42x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	36x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	124x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	73x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $352

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)