To Intel X79

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	85.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	To Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190717
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '19 at 10:56
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 76 1-Core 100 2-Core 187 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 502 50% 408 Pts	64-Core 506 31% 506 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 113 Parallax 93.9 89% 105 fps	MRender 94.3 Gravity 99.6 Splatting 96.1 79% 96.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB 6,044 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0620A SusWrite @10s intervals: 1080 721 656 764 111 145 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 1,254 Write 1,108 Mixed 873 SusWrite 580 213% 954 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 30.4 139% 55.3 MB/s	DQ Read 643 DQ Write 483 DQ Mixed 516 399% 547 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 234%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 245GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 254 249 252 254 356 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 307 Write 218 Mixed 246 SusWrite 287 60% 265 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 22.1 74% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 208 166% 231 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 4x4GB 2,611 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.8% Very good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 27.2 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 9.6 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 88.4 45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	504x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	215x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	95x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	140x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	112x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	89x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	47x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	42x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	198x
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	190x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16