Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	6.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X530FN
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190530
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '19 at 08:44
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	17%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91% Outstanding	Memory 91.2 1-Core 142 2-Core 268 93% 167 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 644 73% 572 Pts	64-Core 644 40% 644 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1C0E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	6.33% Terrible	Lighting 6.47 Reflection 15.3 Parallax 6.62 5% 9.45 fps	MRender 11.4 Gravity 6.67 Splatting 12.1 8% 10 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.33% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1102 256GB 3,311 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 196 195 195 190 197 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 326 Write 232 Mixed 212 SusWrite 194 54% 241 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 48.5 4K Mixed 31.1 106% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 268 215% 304 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 245GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 104 103 106 107 107 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	67% Good	Read 126 Write 124 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 106 69% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.5 171% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Kingston KHX2400C14S4/8G 16GB 404 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	74.3% Very good	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 21.3 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 28 SC Mixed 24.4 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	160x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	159x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	236x
MX150-0NvidiaBench 14%, 29,453 samples	85x

SSD
SD9SN8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 3,311 samples	89x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV512TBN 512GBBench 79%, 14,424 samples	21x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	12x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	116x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	23x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16