Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '19 at 07:05
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 177
75% 126 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 408
49% 378 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Lighting 28.3
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 35.2
23% 31.4 fps
MRender 29.8
Gravity 28.4
Splatting 33.7
25% 30.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 65 71 75 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 313
Write 296
Mixed 232
SusWrite 84.9
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 10.2
49% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 33.9
60% 118 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 86%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
29GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 100 104 108 114 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 92.7
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 103
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
451GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 126 127 130 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 114
Write 79.3
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 127
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-011.A03LF 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $344
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback