Compaq Presario CQ-17

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemCompaq Presario CQ-17  (all builds)
MotherboardCompaq Compaq Presario CQ-17
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170922
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 20 '19 at 01:19
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Celeron N3350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
15% Very poor
1-Core 32.1
2-Core 57.4
21% 44.8 Pts
4-Core 54.8
8-Core 59.1
8% 56.9 Pts
64-Core 39.2
3% 39.2 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15%
Great: 24%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 3.2
0% 3.4 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 5.9
1% 4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050M 500GB
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GR2OA3N0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 39 67 36 45 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 79.7
Write 89.5
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 47.3
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 60%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unde MS3512NSZ-HA3G1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.97 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 2
6% 2.03 GB/s
Latency 242
16% 242 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 19%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Presario CQ-17 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 25%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Compaq Presario CQ-17

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback