Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150415
Uptime5 Days
Run DateOct 19 '19 at 13:34
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3-4150-$133
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
49.8% Average
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 141
55% 113 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 240
34% 250 Pts
64-Core 207
14% 207 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$179
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Lighting 84.2
Reflection 79.1
Parallax 113
22% 92.1 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 85.1
Splatting 74.1
23% 73.7 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 27%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$34
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 64 81 84 64 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.8% Average
Read 212
Write 209
Mixed 196
SusWrite 84.4
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 6.5
64% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 33.2
80% 164 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 85%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$110
29GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 106 109 113 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 97
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 104
62% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
455GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 106 108 108 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 114
Write 73.8
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 106
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905403-011.A03LF 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.3% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 10.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $536
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback