HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics66.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8437
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime7 Days
Run DateOct 19 '19 at 10:14
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$172
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 27
2-Core 54.2
33% 47.6 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 646
46% 408 Pts
64-Core 660
44% 660 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$330
HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.86
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.1% Good
Lighting 93.5
Reflection 234
Parallax 284
25% 204 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 250
Splatting 193
68% 206 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 86%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$36
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 93 110 125 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 866
Write 124
Mixed 183
SusWrite 102
69% 319 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 16.8
57% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 205
155% 213 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 188%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
235GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 146 148 149 151 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 165
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 148
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 107%
WD Elements SE 25FE 1TB
488GB free, PID 25fe
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 41 41 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 39.5
Write 38.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 40
50% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1
172% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 24.6
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 1,979 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $640
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $180Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $142Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $42
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback