MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	MSI MS-7885
Motherboard	MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150320
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '19 at 00:07
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$178 80,283 User benchmarks, average bench 82% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 98.9 2-Core 192 76% 127 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 588 62% 482 Pts	64-Core 781 52% 781 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$510 376,421 User benchmarks, average bench 118% Asus(1043 8706) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Lighting 164 Reflection 156 Parallax 166 133% 162 fps	MRender 178 Gravity 135 Splatting 106 114% 140 fps
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 128%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$99 29,324 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 201 180 154 160 172 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 430 Write 266 Mixed 306 SusWrite 191 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 5.2 81% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 35.1 99% 210 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 102%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90 71,616 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 527GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 106 106 108 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 132 Write 175 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 106 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.4 282% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 4x4GB 9,261 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 2134 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	MC Read 38.1 MC Write 40.4 MC Mixed 35 108% 37.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 19.7 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 912 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $178Bench 82%, 80,283 samples	468x
Core i7-6800KIntel $379Bench 83%, 36,399 samples	256x
Core i7-5930KIntel $444Bench 83%, 29,652 samples	63x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $450Bench 106%, 816,196 samples	143x
GTX 1070Nvidia $330Bench 80%, 1,013,968 samples	84x
GTX 970Nvidia $340Bench 51%, 642,081 samples	74x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $125Bench 110%, 647,981 samples	47x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $70Bench 102%, 737,528 samples	33x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $115Bench 114%, 362,789 samples	30x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 67,025 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 58%, 175,268 samples	34x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 28,583 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $753

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $200	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16