PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110916 |
Uptime | 52.2 Days |
Run Date | Oct 18 '19 at 23:54 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | NOR-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
67.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
AMD(1002 0B00) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 229 195 106 107 107 MB/s
|
62.4%
Good
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
465GB free
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 50 40 45 56 51 MB/s
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
501GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 91 92 92 92 MB/s
|
55.4%
Above average
|
|||
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 75 75 74 74 MB/s
|
42.3%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
44.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 433x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 318x |
Core i7-2700KIntel $89Bench 73%, 20,692 samples | 173x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 102x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 93x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 83x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $1,018 |