bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DX58SO2
Memory19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120129
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 18 '19 at 23:43
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 980-$148
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 175
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 453
50% 394 Pts
64-Core 641
40% 641 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000D
Nvidia(10DE 0914) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
6.39% Terrible
Lighting 7.47
Reflection 8.81
Parallax 6.19
6% 7.49 fps
MRender 9.43
Gravity 7.77
Splatting 8.43
7% 8.54 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.39%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 0 240GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 181 175 168 142 175 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.8% Average
Read 252
Write 179
Mixed 220
SusWrite 166
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 19.1
61% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 78.2
DQ Write 75.5
DQ Mixed 43.8
42% 65.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 82%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
31GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 69 67 67 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
40% Average
Read 71.2
Write 77.5
Mixed 59
SusWrite 67.7
51% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 40%
Great: 88%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235
870GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 137 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 134
Write 130
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 137
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.5
198% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 121%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$174
591GB free
Firmware: CC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 72 72 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 62
SusWrite 67.8
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 73%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
632GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 123 122 121 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 126
Write 111
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 122
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
219% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 85%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
7GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 18 19 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 76.5
Write 77.3
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 19.9
77% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 33%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 18 19 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 124
Write 69.5
Mixed 81
SusWrite 19.7
89% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
61% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 33%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
116GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 59.7
Write 60.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 19.5
59% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 40%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
430GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 21 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 54.5
Write 55.5
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 19.5
56% 42.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
64% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16%
Great: 40%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
44GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 21 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 59
Write 59.2
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 19.5
56% 43.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
64% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 40%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
162GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 66.7
Write 67.8
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 19.5
66% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 58%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
38GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 66.8
Write 67.8
Mixed 55
SusWrite 19.5
68% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 6 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.7% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.8
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback