To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	71.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190119
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '19 at 23:18
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 88.1 2-Core 166 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 643 58% 489 Pts	64-Core 835 52% 835 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Asus(1043 86BB) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Lighting 93.8 Reflection 83 Parallax 79.3 76% 85.4 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 77.7 Splatting 76.3 62% 75 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NE-128 128GB 3,172 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 33GB free Firmware: S0620A SusWrite @10s intervals: 510 500 499 114 83 82 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 745 Write 518 Mixed 479 SusWrite 298 114% 510 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 96.9 4K Mixed 24.5 140% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 468 DQ Mixed 228 203% 295 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 173%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 56 31 14 21 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 19.2 Write 55 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 32.3 23% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.4 127% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 740GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 146 144 145 145 145 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Read 167 Write 138 Mixed 82.5 SusWrite 145 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- 4x8GB 322 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 47.3 MC Write 40.7 MC Mixed 42.3 124% 43.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 11 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	712x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	615x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	102x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16