Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190610
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '19 at 18:51
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	3%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 124 2-Core 220 81% 143 Pts	4-Core 403 8-Core 661 65% 532 Pts	64-Core 655 40% 655 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1391) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Lighting 61.7 Reflection 71.8 Parallax 59.2 50% 64.3 fps	MRender 68.7 Gravity 59.1 Splatting 67.9 54% 65.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB 50,765 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MA031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 139 143 143 139 141 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 439 Write 284 Mixed 364 SusWrite 155 69% 311 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 33.1 107% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 207 147% 184 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 91%
Asus EHD-A1T 2TB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 885GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 113 114 108 119 75 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 79.8 Write 97 Mixed 95.5 SusWrite 108 71% 95 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GB 33,430 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	48.4% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 14.3 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 15.6 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	732x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	481x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	635x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	577x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	218x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	199x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	172x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	234x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	175x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16