Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190321
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '19 at 15:14
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8350K-$139 23,493 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 127 2-Core 214 83% 143 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 429 51% 393 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 051D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1246 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.2 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.2% Average	Lighting 51.7 Reflection 63.9 Parallax 65.7 42% 60.4 fps	MRender 64.2 Gravity 50.9 Splatting 52.9 45% 56 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 246 19 83 120 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 472 Write 412 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 130 57% 257 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 0.4 44% 11.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 92%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 588GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 107 112 110 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 111 Write 112 Mixed 103 SusWrite 109 81% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 22.4 74% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 20.4 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S Builds (Compare 836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 118%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 108%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	177x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	127x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	101x

GPU
RTX 2080Nvidia $394Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	116x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	102x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	71x

SSD
SU750 1TBAdataBench 89%, 2,753 samples	30x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	29x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	48x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $646

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16