Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	88.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190717
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '19 at 05:23
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 95.1 1-Core 149 2-Core 296 99% 180 Pts	4-Core 581 8-Core 1,066 99% 824 Pts	64-Core 1,082 67% 1,082 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 118 Parallax 99.8 92% 110 fps	MRender 98.9 Gravity 103 Splatting 103 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 256GB 10,211 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0427ANR SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 450 443 427 429 429 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 469 Write 433 Mixed 410 SusWrite 439 99% 438 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 41.8 139% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 279 229% 328 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 194 189 191 192 193 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 103 Mixed 32 SusWrite 190 92% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ 2x16GB 508 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	MC Read 34.4 MC Write 35.6 MC Mixed 29.5 95% 33.2 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 36.7 SC Mixed 28.7 81% 28.5 GB/s	Latency 56.8 70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	94x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	88x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	39x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	49x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	23x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	15x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $263

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16