Asus P9D-V Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAsus P9D-V Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P9D-V Series
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '19 at 02:25
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$275
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.9% Good
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 195
70% 147 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 380
52% 380 Pts
64-Core 382
26% 382 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 68%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$126
987GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 59 58 60 68 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 28.2
Write 76
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 62
33% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26%
Great: 66%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
3GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 7.6 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.34% Terrible
Read 17.3
Write 7.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 7.3
10% 9.05 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9965525-138.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 18.3
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 18.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P9D-V Series Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 54%
Desktop 78%
Workstation 53%

System: Asus P9D-V Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $625
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback