Intel powered classmate PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).

Run History

11 months ago, 1 month ago.

Motherboard	Intel powered classmate PC (all builds)
Memory	0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130117
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '19 at 19:29
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	VEN-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Extreme
Intel Celeron 847-$201 2,533 User benchmarks, average bench 12% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	13% Very poor	1-Core 27.2 2-Core 47.8 18% 37.5 Pts	4-Core 50.6 8-Core 54.8 7% 52.7 Pts	64-Core 48.5 3% 48.5 Pts
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 14%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 25,484 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 9997) 744MB Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3517 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	0.48% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 1.9 0% 2 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 2.8 0% 2.2 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.48% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST250LM0 ST250LM004 HN-M2 250GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AR1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 48 53 45 50 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 58 Write 51.5 Mixed 38.3 SusWrite 49.2 36% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 49%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power4G 4GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 3e00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 4.1 4 4.1 4.1 3.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	4.26% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 10.3 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 3.8 12% 9.77 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.26% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT25664BF160B.D8FE 1x2GB 214 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 8 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 95.3 42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical powered classmate PC Builds (Compare 599 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 18%

Surfboard

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel powered classmate PC

CPU
Celeron 847Intel $201Bench 12%, 2,533 samples	361x
Celeron N2805IntelBench 7%, 163 samples	88x
Atom N2600IntelBench 6%, 1,259 samples	56x

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 25,484 samples	358x
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 54,513 samples	167x
Graphics Media Accelerator 3600IntelBench 0%, 1,413 samples	56x

SSD
SSD 32GBAdataBench 25%, 107 samples	5x
U100 32GBSandiskBench 35%, 255 samples	3x
U100 16GBSandiskBench 23%, 301 samples	2x

RAM
CT25664BF160B.D8FE 1x2GBCrucialBench 21%, 214 samples	170x
1x4GBUnknownBench 25%, 91,156 samples	89x
1x2GBUnknownBench 16%, 63,058 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $201

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244	Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200	AMD RX 590 $180	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360	Nvidia RTX 2060 $324	Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24